What your suggestion is :
Having a quality control when it comes to resources (ofc) im that kind of guy who goes for quality instead quantity, i dont know about others but i hate to see some people double posting resource just to get likes or to show that they are 'doing something' to the community.. even some are sharing plugins from other leak forums.. i do my job reporting them and i like when i see my report when thru and the post was deleted, i feel like im doing my job going for a better place.. but i feel like im the only one wanting a better community.. its rare to see some action when i dont report.. for real.. sometimes i want to download every resource that i can just to make tests to see if its a guy just reposting a sht post or if the guy is re-posting from another leak forum but im a user and these tests should be done by the staff.. even caring about "do we already have this resource here leaked from us or from another one?" "if yes, they are the same or this one is better than the other one?"
I know 3 guys here that use to re-post from other known forum.. but they still doing it even against the bsmc ToS.. so its like.. theres a ToS, bsmc doesnt care at all and they only take action when someone report.. it should be bsmc staff duty.. to have this quality control..
Some people do post links to theyr channel as advertise option, to paid announces (not adf.ly but really paid ones), and so.. i dont know but warning points, temporary ban, permanent ban..
Pros :
- Quality control could bring better resources post
- Quality could make us feel more comfortable when downloading a resource from here cuz we would be sure that its approved by staff so it would be a sht post..
- Quality would it self make losers think twice about posting sht things
Cons :
- Quality could reduce a little the amount of posts, cuz we now some are re-post/sht posting (and i dont think that bsmc want to have things like this, i mean, its better having tons of sht posting than only 1 good post)
- Quality could make people complain about they they post werent accepted
- Quality control could reduce amount of members.. due the fact of warning/banning them.. but well rules are rules.. and people should know it..
- Quality would bring a little more work to staff.. but what is staff meant for if not care about the community and the service?
Argument For it : is all together with suggestion/pros/cons itself..
Counterargument : it shouldnt come from me.. so, im pretty sure it comes from staff as a reply about my arguments
Having a quality control when it comes to resources (ofc) im that kind of guy who goes for quality instead quantity, i dont know about others but i hate to see some people double posting resource just to get likes or to show that they are 'doing something' to the community.. even some are sharing plugins from other leak forums.. i do my job reporting them and i like when i see my report when thru and the post was deleted, i feel like im doing my job going for a better place.. but i feel like im the only one wanting a better community.. its rare to see some action when i dont report.. for real.. sometimes i want to download every resource that i can just to make tests to see if its a guy just reposting a sht post or if the guy is re-posting from another leak forum but im a user and these tests should be done by the staff.. even caring about "do we already have this resource here leaked from us or from another one?" "if yes, they are the same or this one is better than the other one?"
I know 3 guys here that use to re-post from other known forum.. but they still doing it even against the bsmc ToS.. so its like.. theres a ToS, bsmc doesnt care at all and they only take action when someone report.. it should be bsmc staff duty.. to have this quality control..
Some people do post links to theyr channel as advertise option, to paid announces (not adf.ly but really paid ones), and so.. i dont know but warning points, temporary ban, permanent ban..
Pros :
- Quality control could bring better resources post
- Quality could make us feel more comfortable when downloading a resource from here cuz we would be sure that its approved by staff so it would be a sht post..
- Quality would it self make losers think twice about posting sht things
Cons :
- Quality could reduce a little the amount of posts, cuz we now some are re-post/sht posting (and i dont think that bsmc want to have things like this, i mean, its better having tons of sht posting than only 1 good post)
- Quality could make people complain about they they post werent accepted
- Quality control could reduce amount of members.. due the fact of warning/banning them.. but well rules are rules.. and people should know it..
- Quality would bring a little more work to staff.. but what is staff meant for if not care about the community and the service?
Argument For it : is all together with suggestion/pros/cons itself..
Counterargument : it shouldnt come from me.. so, im pretty sure it comes from staff as a reply about my arguments
